What should be Chelsea's lineup against Juventus?

This Wednesday Chelsea start their defence of the Champions League against the Italian Champions Juventus and the question of what line up Chelsea should be playing against them has come up again after the teams failure beat QPR on the weekend and Torres outburst when being subbed off.

Knowing Di Matteo, I expect this to the be the line up he goes with. Employing Ramires on the right wing, playing Fernando Torres upfront and partnering Lampard and Obi Mikel in the middle again. I wouldn't say that this would be disastrous be any means however we have seen already this season that it isn't quite working at the moment and maybe a little change is in order to keep certain players on their toes.

I think that the time has come for Sturridge to get his chance to start up front. He is a young fearless character so I don't think he would find the tie against Juventus daunting, if anything I can only imagine he would just see it as challenge and raise his game accordingly. This would also help to refocus Torres and remind him he isn't the only striker in the team and hopeful give him that kick to start scoring again.

Ramires on the right wing is not a bad idea as his work rate and defensive capabilities could be affective in the game however I think they would be better suited to the middle of the park helping to close down Pirlo and stopping him from dictating the game, so I would look to play him in the double pivot with Lampard.

Against QPR in Chelsea's last match Di Matteo played Ryan Bertrand on the left wing which I really don't understand when we have so many better attacking options in the team. I think that Victor Moses should be playing on the wings from the beginning so that we take an attacking initiative in the match instead of having to react and bring players of the bench to try to win the game. 

What do you guys think? Have I got it wrong? What lineup would you go for? Leave a comment below

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

Has the time finally come for Sturridge to start upfront?

After Torres' recent outburst on the weekend when substituted against QPR has the patience of the Chelsea fans finally started to wear thin? When Fernando Torres first signed for Chelsea for £50 million I don't think there was a Chelsea fan happier then me as we had just signed one of the best strikers in the world and I could only see great things in future for him at Chelsea.

However fate has had different idea and Torres' time at Chelsea hasn't been anything like expected with him struggling to find form or score goals regularly. I wouldn't say it has been down to a lack of desire or effort but with an in form Drogba in front him and his own confidence on the floor he has found it hard to find his scoring touch consistently like he was doing at Liverpool. Even though his form in front of the goal as been poor for Chelsea the fans have stuck behind him, showing great support when many others would have turned against him, but I think that it could be now time to give Daniel Sturridge more of starting opportunities he craves so much.

I know a lot of people say that Sturridge can be greedy and yes I would agree that it can be frustrating when he takes shots from distance when he could have been slipping someone threw, but you must remember he is a striker who was being played out of position on the wing and upfront his direct style and selfishness is something all top strikers have and we seem to be missing this with Torres upfront. To be honest I think that if Torres didn't have such a huge price tag hanging over his head Sturridge would most probably be starting a lot more games as a striker for Chelsea as his form over the last 2 years for both Bolton and Chelsea has been considerable better then Torres'.

Recently Torres has found signs of getting back to his best, winning the Golden Boot at the European Championships and scoring a couple of goals this season, but I think his Golden Boot was slightly tainted by the fact that for majority of the competition Spain played Fabregas, a midfielder, upfront instead of him which  I couldn't see happening if David Villa was fit, which definitely shows that Del Bosque had major doubts as to whether Torres could do the job. 

I hope Torres does return to his goalscoring form of his Liverpool days but at the moment I can't quite see it, so think that even though Torres will continue as are main striker this year Sturridge should be given more chances upfront to show us his quality.

What do you guys think? Did I get it wrong? Leave a comment below to share you thoughts.

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

Does Lampard still have a role to play in Chelsea's 4-2-3-1 formation?

Since Roberto Di Matteo has been the manager his definite preferred formation is the 4-2-3-1. We have had great cup success since switching to it, winning the Fa Cup and the Champions League as a result with Lampard and Obi Mikel deployed as the two holding midfielder's.

However I think that the effectiveness of the formation may have been over hyped, as in the league Chelsea fell from fourth to sixth in the league when using it last year and much of the success of the formation was down to how uniquely great Didier Drogba was at playing up front by himself and doing the remarkable.
Now that Drogba has gone to China, Chelsea are now trying to change their style of play from very defensive to a more attractive brand similar to the likes of Barcelona and Arsenal and questions are starting to be asked about whether Lampard should be a starter in the 4-2-3-1 formation for the blues any more especially with addition of Oscar to the squad.

So far this season Lampard and Obi Mikel have partnered each other in the middle as the two holding midfielder's and the team have had some decent results, however the two performances against Manchester City and Atlectico Madrid have seen questions arise as to whether the two can play alongside each other throughout the season and help lead the team to glory this year. I personally don't think as a two, Mikel and Lampard compliment each other well enough to be a consistently good pairing in the middle for Chelsea. They both lack and pace and neither are what I would call exceptional defensively. For me, if Lampard is to have any part to play in this formation it would have to be alongside Ramires as they seem to compliment each other better. Ramires has the legs to cover all the pitch and isn't scared to get stuck in and Lampard has the technical ability and football brain to start attacking moves and get the team moving forward so that to me seems like the better option.

I think that Lampard's technical ability and football brain is very vital to any success Chelsea could have this year, but I am aware that a lot of fans want to see Oscar get a chance to show what he is all about as they see him as the future of the Chelsea midfield. In this case Lampard would have to drop to the bench in my opinion and Oscar would play alongside Obi Mikel as this seems like it would be a  good balanced partnership with Mikel being the more defensive minded of the two and Oscar the more technical getting the ball forward, making driving runs through the centre and creating chances. Oscar's also has great work rate and closes down well which is also a great quality to have in the centre of the park, so this partnership could be as equally as productive as the Lampard and Ramires one.

That said I definitely believe that Lampard has still has a big part to play for Chelsea in the 4-2-3-1 formation, however not in the partnership he is currently being deployed in. We have seen recently for England that if he is played right he is such a great creator and goal threat, but at the same time I understand there are other options for Chelsea's midfield this season and if he isn't playing to his standards then changes should be made.

What do you guy think? Did I get it right? Leave a comment below to share your thoughts.

LetsTalk #KTBFF


Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

QPR vs Chelsea: LetsTalks Match Review

Even though the game finished as goalless draw the game itself was pretty action packed with both teams creating numerous chances which on another day would have resulted in a goal.

Before the game even started the much anticipated 'will they or won't they shake hands' finally played out with Anton Ferdinand not refusing to shake John Terry's and Ashley Cole refusing to shake Ferdinand's. To be honest I didn't expect any less from either parties, as they didn't take the bigger picture in mind.

Any way enough of that rubbish lets get to the game. Chelsea started the game very well in the first half catching QPR on the break when Ramires was released down the right wing by a threw ball by Torres, which he squared to Hazard who shot first time and drew a great save from Julio Cesar. Torres not long after made a promising run beating two players before cutting back onto his left foot, letting off a decent shot which was saved by the keeper again. Chelsea then should have been awarded two penalties, first from a foul on hazard when he drove into the box and was taken down by a clumsy Wright- Philips challenge and  then when Terry was dragged to the ground by Nelson but the referee felt differently. After this QPR gradually got back into the half mainly through Zamora's hold up play and Andy Johnson's off the ball movement causing the Chelsea defence some problems.

In the second half the QPR started off much the better side, dominating possession and creating some great chances mainly down to Chelsea pumping the ball in the air to front men where are lack of size really became evident. Wright- Phillips started getting behind Chelsea's back line but his end product was never quite good enough. 10 minutes into the second half QPR had a great chance to take the lead when Granero clipped the ball into the box from the right which found Park Ji-Sung free but his header was tame and Cech relieved, saved the shot with ease.

To get back into the game Chelsea replaced Bertrand on the left wing with Moses, who for me should have been starting in the first place. I don't really understand why Di Matteo continues to play Bertrand there when we have several better options however that discussion is for another day. With the introduction of Moses Chelsea reverted back to their familiar 4-3-3 formation and where creating chances again. As the game began to approach the final whistle Mikel made a very lazy back pass to Cech which was intercepted by Zamora but he couldn't find the finish thanks to great scrambling from Cech and a lack of conviction on his part. The final chance of the game then came to Hazard who blazed over the bar after great work from Moses down the right wing. He should really have done better with the chance however it wasn't meant to be and the game finished 0-0.

To be perfectly honest the draw was a fair result for both teams. Even though Chelsea should have been awarded two penalties they didn't do enough to secure the win which they should really be getting against QPR. With the first game of the Champions League coming this week against Juventus, Chelsea are going to have to improve if they wish to get their defence of the crown off to a good start as you can only imagine Juventus will offer a greater challenge then an average QPR team. That said the result see's Chelsea remain top of the Premier League which is great.

What do you guys think? Leave a comment below and follow.

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

QPR vs Chelsea - LetsTalks Matchday Preview

So far this season Chelsea's league form has been magnificent, with the team picking up 3 wins from their first 3 games making them the only team in the English leagues to still have a 100% record and they head off to Loftus Road this weekend to take on their fierce London rivals, which is bound to be filled with incidents not least  the Anton Ferdinand and Terry 'handshake'.


Unlike Chelsea, QPR haven't had the most glamorous start to this year campaign. In their first 3 games they have only managed to pick up 1 point from a possible 9, losing the first game 5-0 to Swansea, drawing 1-1 on the road to Norwich and then inevitably losing 3-1 to Manchester City a week later. QPR have made a lot of new interesting signings this summer bringing in the likes of former blue Jose Bosingwa, Esteban Granero from Real Madrid and Ji- Sung Park from Manchester United who have quality in their own right however you can expect that its going to take a little while for all their new signings to gel so I think this tie could have come to soon for QPR in that respect.

Even though Chelsea have made a great start this season in the league they haven't been short of their own defeats in the two cup competitions so far this season. Firstly losing in the Community Shield 3-2 to Manchester City and then suffering an embarrassingly heavy defeat to Atlectico Madrid 4-1 in the European Super Cup shows that it is very possible to get at Chelsea as we still look a vulnerable at back at times. The only real problem I see Chelsea having against QPR this weekend would be if Ashley Cole and John Terry were unavailable as even though there is cover with Cahill and Ryan Bertrand the back line without them two especially Terry doesn't fill me with the greatest confidence as whenever Luiz and Cahill play alongside each other Chelsea tend to concede a lot of goals.
With that said I still can't look past a Chelsea victory as I think that Chelsea's attacking line of Torres, Hazard, potentially Moses as I hear Mata could be rested and Oscar seems just way to strong and bit of miss match against the likes of Bosingwa, Nelson, Ferdinand and Fabio.

I predict a 3-1 victory for Chelsea from a very action packed game and hopefully Torres can chip in with a couple of goals.


What do you guys think? Have I got it wrong? Leave a comment below

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

Should Anton Ferdinand shake John Terry's hand?

This weekend Chelsea and Queens Park Rangers take each other on in what is a pretty fierce derby at the worst of times and to add more spice to this occasion the dreaded 'handshake' debate has risen its ugly head again.


Supposedly the QPR players are going to hold a dressing room meeting today over whether any of the players should shake hands with John Terry at the beginning of the game over the 'alleged' racist comment made towards Anton Ferdinand in the same tie last season. Some QPR players like Bobby Zamora who is mixed raced himself don't have any problems shaking Terry's hand saying, ' I'll shake John Terry's hand- he's still a pal', however Ferdinand doesn't wish to shake Terry or Ashley Cole's hand who was in support of Terry at the trail this year where Terry was cleared of racially abusing Ferdinand.

For me there is no place for racism in society however I think that there is to much emphasis being put on this 'handshake' between the two players as the media just want something to talk about. To me this shouldn't even be news. I think that Anton Ferdinand should shake his hand whether John Terry made the comment or not as it would show that regardless of what any body with racist intent says or does it doesn't have any effect on you and won't go on to define you as a person. If you think about it if John Terry did actually say what has been alleged then it would have been to throw Anton Ferdinand off his game and get at him mentally and by him not shaking his hand a whole year later this would show it worked. He should just shake his hand and do his best to help his team get a victory this weekend, 'God forbid'  and prove his point this way.

What do you guys think? Have I got it wrong? Leave a comment below

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on Twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

Malouda's treatment by Chelsea?

Malouda is currently seen as surplus to requirements at Chelsea and the club have made this clear by recently trying to sell him to Brazilian clubs Botafoga and Santos, this being his preferred destination as his wife is Brazilian. However his wage demands have caused the proposed deals to collapse and it now seems that he his going to see out the last year of deal out at Chelsea.

The Champions League squad was announced the other day and Malouda was completely omitted from the 25 man squad which just goes to show that if he thought he may still have a chance to prove him self this year  at the club then that chance just disappeared altogether. However Chelsea have now gone on to make him train with the under 21s and play reserve games for the remainder of his contract which to me just seems extremely petty and reminds me of exactly what happened last year with AVB in charge and the way he treated Anelka and Alex. I understand that you may not see him in your plans any more but to make him go to play with the under 21 squad just doesn't seem to be needed. I'm not going to sit here and say 'Oh Malouda has been one my favourite players since he has been at Chelsea', but at the same time you have to appreciate he has played an important role in are recent successes, whether that be in our Premier League winning season where we did the double and last season when we captured the Champions League and FA Cup so I feel he should be treated with a bit more respect then Chelsea are showing him currently.

At the end of the day Chelsea are still paying his wages so he might as well be training with the first team. Even though we seem to be pretty solid in attacking midfield and wide positions injuries do and can happen at any time so you just never now when someone could be needed to play so to totally disregard him like this could be a huge mistake. I can also imagine it may make people like Lampard and Ashley who are coming to  the end of their contracts think twice before agree new deals with the club as this could be them in a couple of years if I fall out the managers plans, so might thinkwhy should I stick around? Just a thought.

What do you guys think? Did I get this right? Leave a comment below

LetsTalk #KTBFF

Follow me on twitter @LetsTalkChelsea

What to make of the departures of Meireles and Essien?

On the last day of the English transfer window Chelsea loaned Michael Essien to Real Madrid and several days later sold Raul Merieles to Fernabahce.

For me I really felt that letting Essien go was a mistake as he still had a lot to offer the team and that even though he had suffered from injuries over the last few years he could still be a force in are midfield and if given a good run of games is still easily one of the best midfielders in the world, but I could begrudgingly except him leaving as there was still decent cover in his position.  However when I then heard just a few days later that Raul Meireles was also leaving I was completely baffled with what Chelsea were doing. I am not the biggest fan of Meireles by any stretch of the imagination however with Essien already gone on loan you immediately think that he will be battling with Lampard and Mikel for one of the two defensive midfield positions as even though he isnt't magnificent at either going forward or backwards he is more than competent enough to do a good job in that role.

Now looking at Chelsea's central midfield I feel concerned with what could be in store for us this season. As we have seen this season already against Manchester City and Atletico Madrid, Mikel and Lampard playing together in the defensive midfield position isn't formidable at the moment. There are times where them playing together is a good idea like against the lesser teams but against the elite teams I can't see it working well throughout the season as neither is great defensively. I feel that Lampard has to be a starter for Chelsea, his intelligence on the field is invaluable and can get the team moving from deep like Pirlo does in Italy as well as contribute with the odd goal. Therefore the player that play beside him has to be defensively very solid and even though Mikel has improved his consistency isn't good enough and doesn't dominate enough. So if Mikel isn' the guy that can play that role all the time, who can?

The only two feasible options would be Ramires and Romeu. Ramires could play the role but he isn't really any better then Mikel playing in a defensive midfield role. He does offer pace and agility which Mikel doesn't and has great work rate but he can be extremely clumsy in a challenge and doesn't quite have the discipline to perform that role consistently yet. Romeu for me has all the mental attributes to play the role in the sense he has the right temperament and understands what you have to do to play the role best out of all four players, however I actually don't think his ability matches this at the moment. He is a decent tackler but he is still pretty weak, slow and not a great passer. As he is young there is a lot of potential for him to improve but this leaves us light in this position. 

Thinking about it more there could be another option that Di Matteo has taken into account which could be playing Oscar deeper in Lampards position which I think could work but then you lose what Lampard gives to the team and still doesn't solve the defensive side of the position.

What do you guys think? Have I got it wrong? Let me know what you think, Leave a comment below.

LetsTalk  #KTBFF

What is Ramires' best position in Chelsea's 4-2-3-1 formation?

When  I think of Ramires I think of a player making bursting runs on the counter, a player with a great work rate and someone who isn't afraid to stick his foot in. With these attributes you can see why he has become a favourite with the Chelsea fans and deserves a place in the starting line up, but where?

I personally think he is more suited to playing in a 3 man midfield like in the 4-3-3 we used to play as even though he is good at both going forward and defending he isn't exceptional at either so in a 3 man midfield being supported by Mikel and Lampard he would be covered perfectly in both departments and give him the platform to show his best attributes.

However as Di Matteo's preferred formation is the 4-2-3-1 this seems very unlucky to happen any time soon so if he is to start, there are only two positions where he could play. One would be the defensive midfield role in the double pivot alongside Lampard in the middle and the other would have to be on the right wing where he has already started this season and had great success there last year. But for me neither position to me screams out Ramires. In the defensive midfield role even though he can tackle he does have the tendency to jump into challenges recklessly and lose his head when there doesn't seem to be the need to which could be really costly in the centre of are midfield. Also his passing isn't sharp enough for that role and I could see him misplacing his passes in situations which he really shouldn't however I think if he was to play in this role he would eventually get better at both these things so it is still a decent option for him.

On the right wing I think would be his best position. He is blessed with so much pace and his high work rate makes him a great option, especially in the games against the top teams where you can find yourself on the back foot a lot of the match. On these occasions he could be employed as a defensive winger and help track back the opposing winger while still being a threat going forward himself. However the drawbacks on playing Ramires on the wing would have to be his dribbling, which can be erratic at the best of times. There are times when the ball seems glued to his feet and you wonder ' Wow! How has he just done that?' but then there a more times where his running at speed and he loses control of the ball and it leaves you frustrated as there was a possible chance on. Also his crossing leaves much to be desired but he has so much energy that it is hard to not see him in the team.

For me I would definitely say he is best suited to playing on the right wing in the 4-2-3-1 formation, but with the introduction of Hazard, Marin and Moses he may not be guaranteed a starting position in are team any more which seems crazy, considering he was one out best players last year.

What do you guys think? Leave a comment a below.

LetsTalk KTBFF

Is Marko Marin really as good as everyone seems to think?

When I first heard about Marko Marin a few seasons ago he was dubbed the new 'German Messi' and was playing some great football alongside the like of Mesut Ozil in an attacking Werder Bremen team. Since then Marin has kinda disappeared off the radar,whereas Ozil has gone on to be one the major stars of world football at Real Madrid leaving Marin far behind. Previously seen as one on the 'best talents' in German football, he has seen that label given to more exciting players like Mario Goetze, Marco Reus, Andre Schurrle and Thomas Muller.

So I ask what is it that people see in Marko Marin that makes him a great acquistion for Chelsea? I know that he is a good dribbler with a good eye for a killer pass, so initially that makes him sound like he is exactly what we need because that type of player is what Chelsea has been missing since Robben left. However from what I've seen of him myself he seems very predictable and extremely weak physical on the ball. I know that there is quality there for sure but I'm not sure whether he will be able to reach the potential that he should and become a major player for us at Chelsea. In my own opinion Victor Moses is a much better option then Marin as I feel he is more suitable to the premier league with his pace and strength to go along with his dribbling abilities.

People may have also forgotten than Marin wasn't one of Di Matteo's signings he was signed by the club before the Champions League final, which was before he got offered the role as permanent manager so may not be held in as high regard by Di Matteo himself. And for all you that disagree with me and then point to his glamorised YouTube videos and say that I am chatting nonsense look at the dates of the videos and when he was actually playing well. You will find NO videos from recent seasons like all the other top stars or starlets in football.

All that said I would love him to prove me wrong and help lead us to loads of success in the future, especially as he was such a cheap signing but at this moment in time I just don't see it.

What do you guys think? Leave a Comment Below.

LetsTalk KTBFF

Does Michael Essien still have a role to play at Chelsea?

How can I put this as simply as possible.... YES!! I personally don't understand how his ability and place in the team is being challenged so greatly buy Chelsea fans and even Di Matteo who seems to even favour Raul Merieles over him at the moment.

I get that he has had a lot of injuries in the past and when he came back for us last season he didn't seem to be as great as he was before but I still can't recall him playing bad for us at any time. Take the Manchester United game where we drew 3-3 last season. This was Essien's first start after coming back from injury and for me he controlled the midfield for the majority of the game and it was only in the last 20 minutes of the game he started to fade which was down to lack of match fitness.

I know that Obi Mikel seems to be Di Matteo's first choice defensive midfielder along side Frank Lampard in the double pivot but I still don't think that he is a better option then the Bison at the moment. Mikel has definitely improved over the years and his performances in our Champions League campaign last year was nothing short of exceptional however I always have the feeling that there is a mistake in him and  I still question whether he can keep such high level over a long period of time. He also doesn't offer enough going forward for me compared to Essien. I don't buy into the claims that he just plays simple passes side to side however I still think he needs to improve on his link up play in the same way Alex Song did last year for Arsenal and dramatically improve his shooting which is just woeful at the moment.

I think that know Essien has had a whole pre season this summer he definitely has a role to play for Chelsea this season whether it be in rotation with Mikel or as his deputy I still believe he has a lot to offer and would without doubt return to being the engine room in our midfield if given the chance this year.

What do you guys think? Leave a comment below

LetsTalk KTBFF

What should we expect from Chelsea this season?

What should we as fans be looking for from Chelsea this season? Should would be challenging the two Manchester clubs for the title, Champions League qualification with a top 4 finish or complete domination of all competitions.


Looking at how we are trying to play this season, with a new change in playing style from being a more physical team to a more attractive and attacking team and the massive influx of new small creative players I think that from this season I'd be more than happy with a top four finish and anything on top of that 'like cup success' would just be a bonus. Even though we won the Champions League and the FA Cup last season we still finished 6th in the league last season and we all know as fans that we are lucky that we succeeded in the Europe, otherwise we could potentially HAVE turned into another Liverpool who are just mediocre in the league even though they are trying to make a fight back to the top with their new signings.

Taking our new style and signings into account and how bad we were last year in the league I think that a top 4 finish preferably 3rd would definitely be a successful season for us and would then act as the perfect platform for us to properly challenge the two Manchester clubs for the league next season as all of our new signings would have properly adjusted to the pace and quality of the league. Obviously if Chelsea are able to mount a challenge for the title or even win it this year I would be delighted but I think we have to remember how things where only a few months ago when AVB was sacked and how we were feeling and how bad we could have been feeling without the European success, so if things don't continue to go as swimmingly as they are currently just try be patient with Di Matteo and the team I'm certain next year will be Chelsea's.

What do you guys think leave a comment below.

LetsTalk KTBFF

Do Chelsea need another striker?

After watching Chelsea start the season so well, winning their first 3 games well and seeing Torres start to find the back of the net and look like his old self, I've been thinking do Chelsea really need to but another striker as all football pundits seem to be saying.



Throughout the whole summer transfer window Chelsea has been constantly linked with forwards, most notably Cavani and Hulk who are both respectively great strikers however would they be causing more problems then solving if either arrived. If either was to sign they would come with a hefty price tag so would most probably have to play for that very fact and as we only play one upfront with Di Matteo's 4-2-3-1 formation Torres would find himself on the bench which to me just doesn't make any sense.

 Another problem that I see in signing another striker would be it getting in the way of Daniel Sturridge's development as well as Romelu Lukaku's when he comes back next season who was also signed for a sizeable fee. I personally think that Sturridge is good enough to play upfront for Chelsea this season whether its due to Torres being absent through injury or poor form. He has proved already in his short career he can score goals, doing so for Bolton on loan as well as for Chelsea last season reaching double figures from the right wing. I know there is the argument that he is to selfish on the ball and not a good enough team player, which I can definitely admit to it annoying me sometimes however he is a striker and if  he was to get the chance to play in that position I can only see that being an advantageous attribute, I just hope he is given a real chance there this season. Also the recent acquisition of Victor Moses could be a possible option to play upfront for us if we really needed to so I really don't think another striker is needed for Chelsea this season.

What do you guys think? Leave your comments below.

LetsTalk KTBFF

Dear Torres please stop talking

After arguably the greatest moment in Chelsea history with are first success in the Champions League its has come out that Fernando Torres has rained on our parade. 

He has been quoted saying, "It's contradictory because I feel like I’m at a peak moment in my career, with more desire and hunger than I’ve felt in a long time but I've had to spend the final on the bench," he told AS.

"It was a huge disappointment when I saw the line-up, perhaps the biggest in my life.

"I wanted to take a penalty but they didn't let me."

Victorious Torres with Champions League Trophy

"I've felt like they treated me in a way that I didn't expect not in the way that was spoken of when they signed me.

"We've had a lot of talks and we’ll talk about my future because the role I've had this season is not for me, nor is it the one I expected to play when I came here. I’m not comfortable.”

"Football has been fair on us, on me. Now I do feel like football is worth it but I've been through a difficult time. The worst in my career. [I] don’t want that again," he added.

"There’s been many times when I've felt lost, I wasn't sure what to do. I felt like I didn't know where I belonged.

"I'm eternally grateful to my family who have been by my side and also for the support of the owners who have stuck by me. And especially to the fans, if it hadn't been for them this season I would have given up.”

I don't know whether to give him the benefit of the doubt as I guess every player wants to play in finals, but did he really need to voice his displeasure so publicly? It isn't as if he has been lighting the pitch up or scoring regularly to even warrant a place in the starting line up. What compounds him even more is that the player starting ahead of him, Didier Drogba is performing every time so he really doesn't have a leg to stand on.  If anything he has been woeful in front of goal and if it wasn't for his recent flurry and the fans staying behind him, his reputation could have been totally destroyed by now. 

Getting on to his point about not being aloud to take a penalty, is he really going there? I have never ever seen him take penalty in my life, so why would he decide that in the final of the Champions League this would be the perfect opportunity to start. Would any of you guys picked ahead of Cole and Luiz? 
I also remember times this season like against Birmingham City in the Fa Cup where he was offered to take the penalty to help end his drought and he turned it down so really I think his comment about not being allowed to take a penalty is just petty.


I still think he is a great player and hope that he stays with Chelsea but just wish he wouldn't moan about his treatment when to be fair he has been treated a lot better then maybe he should have with respect to how many goals he has gotten for the amount of money he was bought for, just imagine if it was Heskey in his position he would have been shot by now. Hopefully he sees sense, has a great European Championship and comes back to Chelsea next year the old Torres scoring the great goals.


Lets talk let me know what you think about Torres and his comments, please comments below.

Defensive Problems

Ok lets talk about this chelsea defense. Why is it that avb is being so stubborn with this high line which is clearly not working what so ever. I understand that he wants us to play really attractive football like the barcelona’s of this world but really who is he kidding, we dont have the players to make that system work.

Are defense is far to slow and are midfield is not dominating enough when it comes to retaining posession so its just not going to work now or anytime soon. He just need to get out of his head that football must be played in a specific way, I am one those people that like results dnt no what you guys think but thats just me and attractive football is all good (which we aint even playing) when your winning but damn we are not.

Alright thats enough with the high line, lets talk bout what you think are best defensive 4 is. Personally it has to be cole, terry , alex , ivanovic all day they are all class players and they do there job well. I cant really understand why he is so insistent on playing david luiz especially when he is allowing him to be so expressive. He is a flippin centre back not no attacking mid! I cant lie he does have some good attacking attributes but its not his job if anything he would be better suited to like rb or dm cause mikel is not cutting it but  i m goona leave the mikel brushing to another time.

Lets Talk, what do u guys think?  Do you agree or not let me know.